This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Research reveals unsafe data disposal

17 October 2011

New research carried out on behalf of the Information Destruction (ID) Section of the BSIA (British Security Industry Association), underlines the fact that there remain serious gaps in how data disposal is handled by public and private sector organisations across the UK.

One worrying statistic is that a third of organisations questioned are still relying on standard municipal waste disposal to deal with even the most sensitive of their information destruction needs, with all the dangers which that entails.

Significantly, the BSIA ID Section commissioned research shows that nearly 19% of organisations have been a victim of serious data fraud. Where such data breaches occurred, the respondents noted that half of these involved paper - demonstrating the need for effective shredding - and the rest were related to computer hard-drives. The loss of data from hard-drives is perhaps not surprising given the number of headline-grabbing cases in recent years, concerning breaches of patient information and customer details, and the sheer quantity of information that is now stored in this way.

In terms of how respondents viewed the threat posed by the loss of confidential information to their organisations, 79% of those who completed the survey felt that, over the past 12 months, the danger had either increased or remained the same. This shows that there can be no room for complacency where information destruction is concerned.

From the research it was found that only half of the organisations questioned are using a professional company to oversee the destruction of their confidential data. More concerning still, according to BSIA, is that within that number only 50% of those who have taken the step to outsource data disposal knew whether their provider actually complied with the European Standard EN15713. Crucially, the BSIA ID Section believes that this should be one of the first questions asked of any secure waste disposal business by a prospective customer.

The survey also sought to discover who within each organisation was responsible for compliance with measures such as the Data Protection Act. It was reported that in nearly 38% of cases it was the IT Manager who took the lead, followed by the Managing Director on 19% and the Facilities Manager on 16%.

Despite the changes in 2010 to the enforcement powers of the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), in particular the ability to issue penalty fines of up to £500,000 to those who breach their Data Protection Act obligations, of those questioned under 41% were aware of this development.

Said Russell Harris, Chairman of the BSIA's Information Destruction (ID) Section: "Our research shows that much more needs to be done by organisations to protect themselves against the threat of data breaches and the potential for the loss of commercially sensitive information or details which could lead to identify fraud. A 'sticking plaster' approach is simply not good enough. We also need to ensure that organisations understand the measures which can be taken against them - such as fines - if they do not comply with the requirements of the Data Protection Act.

"For information destruction, as the survey shows, paper has to remain a key focus as, without the right management systems in place, it can so easily be discarded with less sensitive waste, leaving it open for use by criminal elements. Also, as we have seen, computer related equipment can be problematic if not handled correctly with tens of thousands of confidential records on a single hard-drive. It is obviously encouraging that a number of organisations are now turning to professional information destruction providers for assistance but not only should more be following their lead - a 50% take-up still leaves a serious gap in provision - but it is imperative that when doing so they ensure that such companies are working to best practice standards such as EN15713."



Contact Details and Archive...

Print this page | E-mail this page

http://www.fsifm.com
https://www.chas.co.uk/


MOST VIEWED...

View more articles
Article image

PFM Partnership Awards 2019 winners announced

Winners of this year’s PFM Awards received their trophies last night at the spectacular evening of celebration once again held at London’s The Brewery venu...
Article image

Why the Law Says You Need a Nappy Bin Disposal Service

At home, parents are used to disposing of their babies’ used nappies the same way they do any other domestic waste - bagging it up and sticking it in the r...
Article image

Finalists confirmed for PFM Awards 2019 Account Director of the Year

Following another year of high entry levels for the Account Director of the Year category, four have been selected as the 2019 finalists....
Article image

PFM Awards 2019 categories launched

Those wishing to enter the PFM Partnership Awards this year can now access all the relevant information at Read more Read later
-->

Benchmarking maintenance

BSRIA has just published this year's operation and maintenance benchmarking report as a guide for building operators to evaluate their performance against ...
Article image

How to make working from home become a suitable workplace

The trend of employees working from home is on the rise, and it is only set to increase over the coming years due to the many benefits it provides....
PFM