This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Financial cost of new CRC commitment revealed

22 December 2010

An analysis of the cost to businesses of the amended Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) Energy Efficiency Scheme have been undertaken by hurleypalmerflatt.

The study, by international multidisciplinary consultancy hurleypalmerflatt of its clients from the past two years, shows that while all participating organisations will face considerable cost to their business, those who take a good practice approach to meeting the requirements of the CRC and invest in carbon management stand to lose less money than those only aiming for basic compliance.
The cost of the CRC for a typical organisation with a £1m/year energy spend stands at an estimated £430,000 for those that take a good practice approach to complying with the CRC, while those doing the minimum possible – basic compliance – will see a £640,000 cost to their organisation over the same period, a difference of £210,000.
However, while this sounds like good news for companies going the extra mile, organisations applying good practice are set to lose out more than basic compliance businesses when comparing costs with the original CRC.
In March 2010, hurleypalmerflatt calculated that the CRC would cost basic compliance businesses £280,000 but good practice organisations could receive revenue of £130,000.  Now that revenue recycling has been abolished and all receipts will go to the Treasury, good practice businesses will be £560,000 worse off under the CRC now than predicted in March – whereas basic compliance businesses will be £360,000 worse off.*  
Organisations covered by the CRC must buy carbon credits annually to cover their expected carbon emissions and will be listed in a league table showing the best and worst performers. Companies which invest in carbon management and reduce their emissions will need to buy fewer credits, will perform better in the league table and will have to pay the Government less than others.
“Many now see the CRC as a green tax by another name.  However, our analysis shows even though there will be costs to all it will still pay businesses to invest in good carbon reduction practice,” explains Stuart Bowman, Energy and Sustainability Director, hurleypalmerflatt.  
“Companies need to understand the new CRC and approach it well.  We are in an era where sound environmental practice makes commercial, as well as ethical, sense – it is just frustrating that those organisations approaching carbon reduction in a comprehensive way will not reap the rewards that they would have before.”  
hurleypalmerflatt’s analysis also examined different organisations by type and energy spend.  It shows, at the extreme, that the cost of the changes to businesses with very large energy spend could be over £100m between now and 2017.
*hurleypalmerflatt’s figures are based on an indicative scenario of how the CRC may develop.  It is undiscounted and excludes investment and savings associated with energy/carbon-efficiency measures. Actual results will depend upon a complex set of factors and could vary from those given here.


Contact Details and Archive...

Print this page | E-mail this page


View more articles
Article image

Launch of PFM Partnership Awards 2022 categories

With the categories for the PFM Partnership Awards 2022 now live, entries can be submitted at any time between now and the deadline of Wednesday, 11 May....
Article image

PPE regulations to be extended from April

According to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) the Personal Protective Equipment at Work (Amendment) Regulations 2022 (PPER 2022) will come into effect...
Article image

Premier Team completes City YMCA’s SleepEasy Challenge

On Thursday 27 February a team of six Premier Moves volunteers took part in City YMCA’s SleepEasy Challenge. The Premier volunteers were Dave Russinge...
Article image

Issues of back flushing PIC valves explained

The popularity of Pressure Independent Control (PIC) valves over the last few years has significantly increased and now are the popular choice of many syst...
Article image

Team Member winner’s FM journey and life lessons lead to promotion

Following his dramatic personal journey to the UK and winning the PFM Awards 2021 Team Member trophy, Silence Tjivella is now celebrating promotion with hi...
Article image

Why the Law Says You Need a Nappy Bin Disposal Service

At home, parents are used to disposing of their babies’ used nappies the same way they do any other domestic waste - bagging it up and sticking it in the r...