This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Electrical Compliance – quality and safety are being swept aside by cost-cutting

Author : Ian Carnall, Managing Director of Guardian Electrical Compliance Ltd

06 March 2020

Electrical compliance is a legal duty, as specified within the Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 (EaWR).

Unfortunately, far too many duty-holders see this an obligation that must be dealt with as quickly and cheaply as possible, leading to a box-ticking, corner cutting attitude to compliance.

Maintaining a safe place of work in accordance with the EaWR is not and never has been achieved by compiling records alone.

The risk of an electrical fire, explosion or shock has to some degree been relegated to a tick in the box by someone who may not have an electrical background.

It is reprehensible that cost-saving is the priority over quality and safety throughout much of the industry in a bid to find the cheapest way of achieving electrical compliance.

The resulting race to the bottom to offer the cheapest price has, without question, led to a serious decline in reporting standards.

The implications and impact of compliance

There is a dearth of readily available information regarding what constitutes a safe place of work, how to manage electrical reports and how to evidence the continuous monitoring and maintenance of electrical installations.

This information is vital in providing a dutyholder with a defence in law, should there be a breach of the EaWR, and this absence is one of the main reasons for the current indifference towards electrical compliance.

25 years’ experience distilled into some simple lessons

Guardian has gained an invaluable insight into the right approach to compliance through thousands of client appointments over a 25-year period, chairing regular client dutyholder meetings, delivering over 70 National Electrical Safety Seminars and currently advising a client base of over 2,500 end users.

Electrical compliance requires serious focus and ongoing attention from a collaborative working partnership between supplier and client. It should never be about simply uploading records to a server until the next time, be it three or five years.

Indeed Regulation 4 (1) & (2) of EaWR 1989 states: As may be necessary to prevent danger, all systems, shall at all times be of such construction, so as not to give rise to danger:

• All systems – from a battery to a power station

• All times – no days off, no respite

• Construction – designed, installed maintained and operated

The regulation is difficult, if not impossible to comply with.

However, paragraph 69 of EaWR 1989 does provide a solution and goes on to say, “records of maintenance, including test results, preferably kept throughout the working life of an electrical system will enable the condition of the equipment and the effectiveness of maintenance policies to be monitored.

"Without effective monitoring, dutyholders cannot be certain that the requirement for maintenance has been complied with.”

The IET Wiring Regulations BS7671: 2018 Reg 652.2 goes on to mirror Paragraph 69 of EaWR 1989.

Clearly, EaWR 1989 is calling for an effective monitoring policy, a way of historically evidencing continuous monitoring and maintenance of the electrical system, not just a series of arbitrary tests at the mercy of a contractor who knows how to ‘complete’ electrical reports.

Where or what should the dutyholder(s) refer to for guidance and assistance?

The NICEIC Connections magazine is a great help, particularly from a technical perspective. Hospitals have their Technical Memoranda (HTMs), Universities have something similar, but where is the help for the end user who needs guidance on practically discharging dutyholder responsibilities?

After all, whether electrically biased or not, it is incumbent on the dutyholder under Regulation 3 of the EaWR 1989 to “comply with the provisions of the Electricity at Work Regulations 1989, in so far as matters which are within your CONTROL.”

In other words, if you are in control for a particular aspect of electrical compliance, it is your responsibility.

So, what about the legislation?

For 30 years, dutyholders have had an EaWR memorandum of guidance on how to work safely on or near electrical equipment.

Together with the current edition of BS7671 and the associated eight guidance notes, there is a basis for formulating a methodology for ensuring the electrical installation is safe to remain in service.

Yet still there are gaping holes in basic legislative knowledge and quality of test records, leaving dutyholders unwittingly exposed, should there be an electrical incident leading to a breach of EaWR 1989.

Guardian’s Complete Managed Compliance Service has evolved over a 25-year period, Chastening experiences with the HSE have fundamentally shaped our business, so much so that we employed a former Senior Electrical Inspector from the HSE.

As a consequence, this engendered a new focus when working with electricity from every department within our business.

To find out more about Guardians’ approach to ‘Complete Managed Electrical Compliance’, we are holding a series of CPD accredited Breakfast Seminars throughout the UK.

The Seminars will also look at how the latest technology via TraQit and QR Codes can ease the dutyholder burden of document control and achieve instant on-site access to current records and schedules.

Additionally, and linked in to dutyholder responsibilities will be a brief session on Corporate Manslaughter following Grenfell and the heightened status of compliance.

The first CPD accredited Breakfast Seminar will be held on Thursday June 11th 9am – 11:30am at the Leicester Marriot Hotel.

For further information visit

Print this page | E-mail this page


View more articles
Article image

Open book reporting

In today’s facilities management marketplace there is still a reluctance for some client organisations to procure on an open book basis with fixed cost, ri...
Article image

Why the Law Says You Need a Nappy Bin Disposal Service

At home, parents are used to disposing of their babies’ used nappies the same way they do any other domestic waste - bagging it up and sticking it in the r...
Article image

BIFM becomes IWFM

Following a change of identify, the British Institute of Facilities Management (BIFM) is now known as the Institute of Workplace and Facilities Management ...
Article image

Get to know a real Integrated Workplace Management System

Explore the key benefits, use cases, and capabilities of a true IWMS and learn how it can support organisations looking to improve their

HSE urges legionella awareness as UK begins lockdown easing

Calls for monitoring of water quality by local authorities and industry experts have been further endorsed by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE)....

Measuring FM Performance

Counting costs rather than measuring performance and demonstrating value to business is one of the reasons why FM has failed to achieve a strategic role in...