This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Court case over fire safety failings brought by Camden Council

02 December 2019

High Court legal action has been launched by Camden Council with the aim of recovering costs following the evacuation of residents from the Chalcots Estate tower blocks in 2017.

Urgent works were deemed to be necessary, identified following the Grenfell Tower disaster, to fix a number of fire safety aspects and replace cladding on the Chalcots tower blocks.

As a result, the council said it incurred costs in evacuating residents and employing fire marshals and security staff, along with the cost of the repair work.

Investigations showed that both fire doors and internal fire stopping were inadequate and that aluminium composite material cladding needed to be replaced.

The case has been brought against the PFI consortium Partners for Improvement in Camden (PFIC), which is currently in liquidation, Rydon Construction, Rydon Maintenance, Faithful + Gould and United Living South.

In the meantime, Wates has been appointed as principal contractor to oversee the completion of all necessary works.

A spokesperson for the council said the court case has arisen after "two years' examination of historical agreements, contractual responsibilities and works completed during the period in which we had a contractual relationship with PFIC".

The review has ensured the council is "clear about where responsibility lies for the range of fire safety defects at the Chalcots which led to the evacuation and its associated", said the spokesperson.


Print this page | E-mail this page

http://www.fsifm.com
PFM


MOST VIEWED...

View more articles
Article image

Prevention better than cure where compliancy and PPM is concerned

Industry experts give their response to the question of whether compliance with legislation should be a focus of maintenance procedures....
Article image

Why the Law Says You Need a Nappy Bin Disposal Service

At home, parents are used to disposing of their babies’ used nappies the same way they do any other domestic waste - bagging it up and sticking it in the r...

Benchmarking maintenance

BSRIA has just published this year's operation and maintenance benchmarking report as a guide for building operators to evaluate their performance against ...
Article image

Court action against MoJ after "unfair" contract award

According to The Times, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is being sued by Mitie, following claims that it lost out on...
Article image

Making the Leadenhall Building fit for purpose

Firmly established as one of the most notable buildings in the City of London, the Leadenhall Building (informally known as the cheesegrater) provides a st...
Article image

Industry bodies launch net zero commitment

Organisations and companies have launched the Pledge to Net Zero, claimed to be the first joint UK commitment applying science-based targets to reduce gree...