This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Safety body supports Bill to raise safety fines to £20,000

07 May 2008

The president of IOSH has backed proposals that would see rogue employers face a quadrupling of fines and an increased threat of jail if it becomes law. The Health and Safety (Offences) Bill, introduced by Keith Hill MP (Labour, Streatham) aims to toughen up sentences for H&S at work offences.

Ray Hurst, president of the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH), welcomed the proposals: “If the bill makes it into law, it will send a strong message to employers that health and safety offences are treated just as seriously as other breaches where people can be killed or seriously injured. Our aim is to prevent workplace injuries and ill health that devastate people’s lives and to help ensure more employers take appropriate action to protect their workers.

“Each of the 241 deaths and 274,000 injuries at work last year are a personal tragedy and so we welcome this ‘get tough’ approach. For too long, rogue employers have been able to get away with paltry fines*2 for some dreadful health and safety offences. We hope the measures outlined in this new bill will bring an end to that – we strongly support the need for sanctions that reflect the gravity of the failures involved.”

Keith Hill added: “Over the years, there have been repeated expressions of frustration from the courts at their inability to impose tougher sentences for health and safety offences. Maximum fines for health and safety offences are now way behind those of comparable legislation, such as environmental and food safety, and I firmly believe that isn’t right.

“This bill is not about ruining companies, and it’s not about imposing more red tape on business. It’s about preventing needless injury, ill-health and death in the workplace and ensuring proper punishments are handed down to those organisations who cause such suffering. I’m pleased an organisation of the status of IOSH is supportive of the bill, and I hope we’ll see it come into law in the near future.”

The Health and Safety (Offences) Bill seeks to increase the maximum fine in magistrates’ courts from £5,000 to £20,000 for most health and safety offences, allow more of them to be triable in the higher courts and make imprisonment an option more often.

The changes proposed by the Bill were first recommended following a joint 1999 review of maximum penalties for health and safety offences, by the Home Office, the then Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, and the Health and Safety Executive. Following this, in 2000, in their Revitalising Health and Safety Strategy, the government pledged to seek an early parliamentary opportunity to provide courts with greater sentencing powers for health and safety crimes (Action point 7).

In 2005/06, the average penalty per conviction was just under £10, 000 . If untypical large fines (more than £100,000) are omitted, the average fine was just under £5,000. Provisional figures for 2006/2007 are around £15,000 for the average penalty per conviction and just under £9,000 if fines in excess of £100,000 are excluded.


Contact Details and Archive...

Print this page | E-mail this page

www.fsifm.com
https://www.ironmongerydirect.co.uk/?utm_source=PFM%20MPU&utm_medium=MPU%20Banner&utm_campaign=Jan%202021&utm_term=Clicks&utm_content=Jan%2021


MOST VIEWED...

View more articles
Article image

Why the Law Says You Need a Nappy Bin Disposal Service

At home, parents are used to disposing of their babies’ used nappies the same way they do any other domestic waste - bagging it up and sticking it in the r...
Article image

Why complete transparency on remote education offerings from training providers must be accessible

With the ever-changing global climate, the impact of Covid-19 has seen a wide cross-section of industries significantly impacted, with many individuals los...
Article image

PFM Partnership Awards 2020 trophies to be presented in virtual event

Following the latest lockdown restrictions around the UK, it has been decided that it will not be possible to stage a live event to present the winners of ...

SFG20 updated and online

A new, updated and interactive version of SFG20 - Standard Maintenance Specification for Building Services - has been launched as a web based service which...

Benchmarking maintenance

BSRIA has just published this year's operation and maintenance benchmarking report as a guide for building operators to evaluate their performance against ...
Article image

Compliance – the difference between Regulation and Guidance, a personal view of G3

Having invented a regulatory driven product, I have studied the issue of compliance for a number of years now. Through research and detailed studies, I hav...
https://www.uhubglobal.com
PFM