This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Sussex recycling company fined after incident caused serious injuries to workers

12 March 2018

An explosion and fire at a recycling site that injured eight people, five seriously, resulted in the prosecution of Ereco EMEA Corporation.

Based in Sussex, the incident occurred at the company's site in Hobbs Industrial Estate, Lingfield, Surrey on 3 October 2011.

The site was used for the storage of print toner and the incident saw one worker placed in an induced coma and remain in hospital for 15 weeks, according to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

Concerns over safety in the recycling sector have been raised a number of times by the HSE.

Following the incident in question, a joint investigation by the HSE and Surrey Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) found that there was no adequate safe system of work to reduce risk from dangerous substances at the site.

The investigation also found that Paramount Waste Extraction failed to consider the possibility of the machinery it designed to shred and process toner cartridges could be overloaded.

Portsmouth Crown Court handed a fine of £30,000 to Ereco EMEA Corporation of Lewes Road, Forest Row, East Sussex after it pleaded guilty at an earlier hearing to a breach of Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work, etc, Act 1974 and failing to take fire precautions as specified within the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005.

Costs of £30,000 were also awarded against the company.

Paramount Waste Extraction of Redehall Road, Smallfield, Surrey pleaded guilty to a breach of Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work, etc, Act 1974, receiving a fine of £16,000 and the same amount in costs.

The HSE stated after the hearing that designers and suppliers should ensure risks, including foreseeable misuse, should be taken into account when designing systems.


Print this page | E-mail this page

http://www.fsifm.com
PFM


MOST VIEWED...

View more articles
Article image

Drive to improve procurement practices continues to gather pace

Following calls to improve procurement processes in all areas following the collapse of Carillion last year, the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB...
Article image

Government urged to 'avoid Apprenticeship Levy mistakes' in T levels

Lack of awareness for the new T level qualifications has been highlighted by a recent survey conducted by manufacturers' association Make UK....
Article image

Early involvement of FMs called for in Soft Landings topic guide

Publication of its Soft Landings and Business-Focused Maintenance Topic Guide has been announced by BSRIA, designe...
Article image

Communication is essential for delivery of health and safety

Complying with legislative requirements in all areas of facilities is one of the overriding areas of concentration for all FMs and these are often regarded...
Article image

The rise of the specialist service provider

There is a big shake up going on across the facilities management (FM) market as clients recognise they need more engineering support to help them keep the...
Article image

Why the Law Says You Need a Nappy Bin Disposal Service

At home, parents are used to disposing of their babies’ used nappies the same way they do any other domestic waste - bagging it up and sticking it in the r...
MPU