This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Asbestos dangers highlighted by latest court case

20 November 2017

Further emphasis on the need for FMs and service providers to be vigilant on issues surrounding asbestos has been provided by a recent court hearing.

Hamilton Sheriff Court was informed that four electricians employed by IQA Operations Group had been exposed to asbestos during work at Anderson Tower in Motherwell in 2014.

They had been drilling through door transom panels to fit electric cables as part of the installation of a new low voltage distribution system.

Although an asbestos survey had been carried out in advance of the works beginning, this had not included the transom panels, the court was told.

The electricians drilled holes in the transom panels in all 44 flats on site, with no measures in place to control exposure to airborne asbestos fibres.

Concerns were raised by a resident after the holes had been drilled and the work was stopped while the transom panels were tested for asbestos.

Immediate action was taken to decontaminate the flats after the tests proved positive, with residents moved into temporary accommodation while this was completed.

Following an investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), it was found that IQA Operations Group had failed to implemented a safe system of work to identify the presence of asbestos in the panels, and failed to carry out a suitable assessment of risk to employees when carrying out cable routing work.

Pleading guilty to a breach of Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work, etc, Act 1974, the company, of Abercorn Street, Paisley, was fined £6,000.


Print this page | E-mail this page

http://www.fsifm.com
PFM


MOST VIEWED...

View more articles
Article image

Why the Law Says You Need a Nappy Bin Disposal Service

At home, parents are used to disposing of their babies’ used nappies the same way they do any other domestic waste - bagging it up and sticking it in the r...
Article image

PFM Awards seminars provide unique insight

Yesterday saw the first seminars presented by the PFM Partnership Awards in the event's 26-year history, receiving highly positive feedback from both prese...
Article image

Communication is essential for delivery of health and safety

Complying with legislative requirements in all areas of facilities is one of the overriding areas of concentration for all FMs and these are often regarded...
Article image

ABM UK launches second year of perception change campaign

This month, leading facilities management services provider, ABM UK, kicked off year two of its Junior Engineering Engagement Programme (J.E.E.P) followin...
Article image

CCS confirms modular solutions framework

Designed with the education and healthcare sectors, Crown Commercial Service (CCS) has announced the launch of its Modular Building Solutions framework....
Article image

How to manage and maintain your building’s lifts

Being tasked with the responsibility of managing a building’s lifts, lifting platforms, escalators or moving walkways, can be daunting....