This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Pimlico Plumbers' worker's ruling has employee rights implications

10 February 2017

A ruling by the Court of Appeal has supported the claims for a self-employed employee to be entitled to basic workers' rights.

It involves the case of Gary Smith, who previously worked as a plumber for Pimlico Plumbers on a self-employed basis.

Although VAT-registered and paying tax on a self-employed basis he worked exclusively for the company for six years, according to BBC News.

After suffering a heart attack, Mr Smith asked to reduce his working week from five days to three, but Pimlico Plumbers rejected this and took back the liveried van he had rented from the business.

Mr Smith claimed he was entitled to basic workers' rights, including bringing discrimination claims and receiving the national minimum wage and paid annual leave.

Following a previous ruling by an employment tribunal, which found the company's plumbers were workers but not employees, the Court of Appeal supported the decision and dismissed the Pimlico Plumbers' appeal.

Company founder Charlie Mullins said plumbers were hired on a self-employed basis, providing their own tools and materials.

Although they did not have workers' rights, he said they were paid significantly more, according to BBC News, and Mr Mullins claimed Mr Smith was paid £80,000.

Mr Smith's solicitor Jacqueline McGuigan described the decision as a "resounding victory", as he had been unable to work for other companies due to being "tightly controlled".

Ms McGuigan further stated that the case had clarified the situation regarding different work models, with the potential to have a wider impact on similar cases.

However, the BBC further reported that the Court of Appeal judges advised caution before deciding if the case had implications for clarifying the position of casual working arrangements.


Print this page | E-mail this page

http://www.fsifm.com
PFM


MOST VIEWED...

View more articles
Article image

Drive to improve procurement practices continues to gather pace

Following calls to improve procurement processes in all areas following the collapse of Carillion last year, the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB...
Article image

Government urged to 'avoid Apprenticeship Levy mistakes' in T levels

Lack of awareness for the new T level qualifications has been highlighted by a recent survey conducted by manufacturers' association Make UK....
Article image

Early involvement of FMs called for in Soft Landings topic guide

Publication of its Soft Landings and Business-Focused Maintenance Topic Guide has been announced by BSRIA, designe...
Article image

Communication is essential for delivery of health and safety

Complying with legislative requirements in all areas of facilities is one of the overriding areas of concentration for all FMs and these are often regarded...
Article image

Why the Law Says You Need a Nappy Bin Disposal Service

At home, parents are used to disposing of their babies’ used nappies the same way they do any other domestic waste - bagging it up and sticking it in the r...
Article image

The rise of the specialist service provider

There is a big shake up going on across the facilities management (FM) market as clients recognise they need more engineering support to help them keep the...