This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Crossrail worker injuries result in court action against three contractors

12 December 2016

Three contractors have been informed by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) that they will be prosecuted, following separate incidents where workers were injured.

All incidents related to the construction of the new Crossrail project, running east to west across London and concern BAM Nuttall, Ferrovial Agroman (UK) and Keir Infrastructure and Overseas.

They will appear at Westminster’s Magistrates Court in January 2017 where each will face four charges.

Incidents include the death of a worker on 7 March 2014 and one each relating to injuries to two others on 16 and 22 January 2015.

The first worker died after he was crushed by falling concrete on 7 March 2014 while working on the Fisher Street cross-over tunnel, according to the HSE.

Another colleague suffered severe leg injuries while working between the Bond Street and Paddington section of the tunnel on 16 January 2015 when he was crushed by a tipper truck.

A further incident in the same stretch of the tunnel on 22 January 2015 saw the third worker suffer head and hip injuries when he was struck by a high pressure mixture of water and concrete during a routine operation to clean concrete lines.

HSE head of operations, Annette Hall confirmed the prosecutions and said: “We have concluded following thorough investigations that there is sufficient evidence to prosecute and it is in the public interest to do so.”

Court action against the three companies will include:
One charge under section 2 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974;
One charge under section 3 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974;
Two charges under Regulation 22 (1)(a) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007.


Print this page | E-mail this page

http://www.fsifm.com
PFM


MOST VIEWED...

View more articles
Article image

Why the Law Says You Need a Nappy Bin Disposal Service

At home, parents are used to disposing of their babies’ used nappies the same way they do any other domestic waste - bagging it up and sticking it in the r...
Article image

PFM Awards seminars provide unique insight

Yesterday saw the first seminars presented by the PFM Partnership Awards in the event's 26-year history, receiving highly positive feedback from both prese...
Article image

Communication is essential for delivery of health and safety

Complying with legislative requirements in all areas of facilities is one of the overriding areas of concentration for all FMs and these are often regarded...
Article image

ABM UK launches second year of perception change campaign

This month, leading facilities management services provider, ABM UK, kicked off year two of its Junior Engineering Engagement Programme (J.E.E.P) followin...
Article image

CCS confirms modular solutions framework

Designed with the education and healthcare sectors, Crown Commercial Service (CCS) has announced the launch of its Modular Building Solutions framework....
Article image

How to manage and maintain your building’s lifts

Being tasked with the responsibility of managing a building’s lifts, lifting platforms, escalators or moving walkways, can be daunting....
MPU