This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Government widens cladding study to improve fire protection in tall buildings

29 October 2018

Increased risk assessment studies for buildings are being carried out by the government as another effect of the Grenfell Tower disaster in London last year.

Announced by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), the study will assess risks from non-aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding.

The MHCLG issued an advice note for owners of buildings that feature components such as spandrel, window and infill panels, according to Construction Manager.

This follows the forming of a panel of experts with the aim of identifying if additional advice and guidance was required for those using non-ACM cladding materials.

In addition to advising owners of buildings of more than 15m in height and their FMs not to delay removing any spandrels assessed to be unsafe, the government is also highlighting the need to examine design information records.

Another action to consider is checking that products had not been substituted at any point, said the government.

Building owners, FMs and their service providers should check manufacturer recommendation on fire performance or request test certification.

In cases of uncertainty, investigations should include sample testing of panel composition, seeking professional advice and taking care not to disturb materials such as asbestos, the government advised.

The MHCLG said its experts had advised that the best way to ensure materials do not post a risk of spreading fire is to make sure that these are "limited combustibility or better".

Any panels failing to meet this criteria should be removed and replaced, it said.


Print this page | E-mail this page

MPU
PFM


MOST VIEWED...

View more articles
Article image

Why the Law Says You Need a Nappy Bin Disposal Service

At home, parents are used to disposing of their babies’ used nappies the same way they do any other domestic waste - bagging it up and sticking it in the r...
Article image

New company now running Interserve business

Following its entering into administration at the end of last week, the Interserve business has now been transferred to a new company owned by its lenders....
Article image

YLOTY2018 winner comments on his success on the night

This year's PFM Awards Young Leader of the Year winner, Kristian Trend, gives his reaction winning the award after receiving his trophy on 7 November at Th...
Article image

Conference programme confirmed by The Facilities Event

Speakers at The Facilities Event will include idea-generators, thinkers and FM experts, including three PFM Awards judges and the Overall Winner of the PFM...
Article image

Is ‘HOTELISATION’ the key to customer experience in property?

MIPIM is over for another year, and it was a whirlwind of innovation and new developments within the industry....
Article image

HS2 looks to contribute to district heating systems

Engineers working on the HS2 "super-hub" at Old Oak Common in north west London have stated that they can recover the heat from high-speed trains...