This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

https://www.rwmexhibition.com/welcome/about-us

£220,000 fine issued but previous 'good safety' recognised

14 June 2017

Teesside Crown Court has handed a fine of £220,000 to Suez Recycling and Recovery after an employee sustained serious burns at its Billingham, County Durham, energy from waste site.

During the hearing, the court heard that the incident occurred when the worker had attempted to remove a blockage in a chute.

When the blockage fell into a quench pit of water, a plume of hot water, ash and steam was propelled through the open chute.

As a result, the employee suffered burns to his back, arms, legs, face and ears and required treatment in hospital for 11 days.

This was the second time that this type of incident had occurred at the site, with a previous example occurring eight months prior to the one in question, the court was told.

The subsequent safety review resulting from the first incident saw a number of recommendations made, but the court was told that not all of these had been fully actioned.

Speaking on behalf of Suez, barrister Stuart Denney QC said the company wished to issue a public apology for the accident and the injuries sustained by its employee.

The worker continues to be employed by the business and Mr Denney stated that a separate civil action had been settled, negating the need for a further compensation award.

He said that although Suez had made a "real effort" to improve its processes and design a new system following the first incident, it had not been "good enough in making sure everyone followed it".

Further improvements have been introduced since the second incident, said Mr Denney.

Suez had pleaded guilty to a breach of the Health and Safety at Work, etc, Act 1974 during its first court appearance on 10 January this year.

Acknowledging the company's previous good safety record, judge Deborah Sherwin said there had also been safety breaches "over a number of years".

She also recognised that Suez had given the incident "a lot of thought" and put new measures in place to avoid any recurrence.

Judge Sherwin issued a fine of £220,000 and awarded costs of nearly £12,700.


Print this page | E-mail this page

MOST VIEWED...


Article image Issues of back flushing PIC valves explained

The popularity of Pressure Independent Control (PIC) valves over the last few years has significantly increased and now are the popular choice of many system designers.Full Story...

Article image PFM Awards 2017 finalists announced

Successful entries selected for inclusion in the list of finalists for the PFM Awards 2017 have been announced.Full Story...

Join PFM in an exclusive visit to the RWM exhibition in September

PFM Awards 2017 categories announced

Deadline for Young Leader of the Year and Account Director of the Year 2017

http://www.fsifm.comhttps://www.emergencyuk.com/pfm2